2023年新航道托福写作新题型范文集：Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

4月11日，ETS在北京召开了全球发布会，宣布了托福考试全新升级的消息，托福考试迎来全面改革!

自2023年7月26日起， 托福iBT考试的时长将由3小时缩短至2小时以内，取消考试中的10分钟休息时间。其中改革比较多就是托福写作，可以用2个关键字抓住改革的精髓：“短”和“学术”。

►关键字1：“短”：

改革之前要求在30分钟内完成至少300字的独立写作，而现在只要求100字，当然时间也缩短到10分钟。

表面上看，输出速度没有变化，都是10字/分钟。但是，构思慢的学生要小心了。之前完全可以用10分钟构思，再用20分钟写作。现在必须“短平快”：2分钟内读完教授的邮件和学生留言，然后形成自己的思路，马上动笔，绝 对不能拖泥带水。

►关键字2：“学术”：

旧版托福写作有一些接地气的题目，比如《你愿意在家吃饭，还是去饭店?》。问的是个人偏好(Personal Preference)。考生不需要有什么知识储备，只要有生活常识和基本英文能力就能交出一份答案。即便是低龄考生和脱离学校很久的社会人士也可以得到不错的分数。

改革后的题目会“高冷”很多。比如一道样题问你：在过去的两个世纪，推动人类社会进步的最重要的发明是什么?题目还规定你不许讲电脑和手机。ETS示范的满分答卷讨论了“疫苗和抗生素”。但是仔细想想，这要求考生(1)了解科技进步史;(2)有话题词汇储备，比如vaccine, antibiotic, lifespan, pathogen。显然，学术讨论不是仅靠常识就能hold住的。

为了更好的帮助大家考好理想的托福写作分数，今天小编整理了2023年新航道托福写作新题范文集，本篇文章的主题是Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.一起来学习一下吧。

12023年新航道托福写作话题：

Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s

question.

In your response you should:

• express and support your opinion

• make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it.

2托福写作新题范文示例1：

Dr Gupta

Traditionally, teachers have relied on lecturing or leading discussions while students (aged 14-18) listen and take notes. However, some argue that this approach is not effective in

preparing students for the modern workplace. Instead, it is suggested that teachers should prioritize student-led discussions and project-based activities. What are your thoughts on

this issue? Do you believe that traditional teaching methods are still effective, or do you think that a more interactive approach is needed?

Tom

I think that lectures and teacher-led discussions are important in providing a solid foundation of knowledge. With lectures, teachers can ensure that all students receive the same

information and have a common understanding of the material. Additionally, lectures can be an efficient way to cover a lot of material in a short amount of time.

Jerry

I disagree. I think that traditional teaching methods are outdated. With student-led discussions, students have the opportunity to take ownership of their learning and develop

critical thinking skills. This is important for the modern workplace, where employees are expected to work collaboratively and think creatively.

32023年新航道托福写作新题范文示例2：

Personally, I would be in favor of Tom's opinion that it is by no means necessary or imperative for the university to raise the tuition fees. In other words, the university tuition fees

should be confined to a certain level, by which the students could not only afford their schooling cost but also focus more on their study. In particular some financially disadvantaged students, e.g. the unemployed, the impoverished and the rural, once being plagued by a huge financial burden from higher fees, would be compelled to undertake some part-time jobs in their spare time, which will pose a major negative influence to their academic achievement. As a result, they would be strongly unlikely to graduate smoothly and successfully. Thus only if the tuition fees are restricted to a fair and reasonable level, will the educational quality in university be guaranteed in a long run.

AI 打分及评语

Indeed, student-centered discussions can foster an active participation and engagement as they take ownership of studying process and become more devoted in the discussed material. However, this approach is not without any challenge. One common problem associated is an unequal participation. Certain students might fully dominate the conversation, while others could just be the “free rider” feeling reluctant to write a simple word, and this can be tricky to manage, especially in larger groups where there are many different voices to be heard. In my view, I find Tom’s idea more convincing. Teachers are the experts in the subject matter, and their guidance and insights can help students to develop a deeper understanding of the topic. Moreover, teachers can offer the context and background information, answer questions raised by students, and share insights in the light of their experience.

AI 打分及评语

Based on the rubric, I would rate the following sample answer with a score of 4 out of 5.

Revised：

Indeed, student-centered discussions can foster active participation and engagement, as students take ownership of the studying process and become more devoted to the materialbeing discussed. However, this approach is not without its challenges. One common problem is unequal participation, where certain students may dominate the conversation while others feel reluctant to contribute. This can be particularly difficult to manage in larger groups with many different voices. In my view, while student-led discussions have their merits, traditional teaching methods that prioritize teacher-led lectures and discussions are still valuable. Teachers are experts in their subject matter, and their guidance and insights can help students develop a deeper understanding of the topic. However, to mitigate the potential drawbacks of traditional teaching methods, teachers can incorporate interactive elements such as class discussions, group work, and project-based activities to engage students and promote critical thinking skills.