托福写作 | 工作时间会减少吗？满分范文+逻辑拆解，直接抄作业

托福学术讨论写作，如何踩中得分点?今天为大家带来一篇由新航道专业托福写作团队反复校对的真题范文。题目围绕“20年后人们是否会减少工作时间”展开，包含Claire与Paul两位同学的观点。范文从总论点出发，延展Claire视角、回应Paul的质疑，并以AI效率的真实调查数据作为支撑，逻辑严密、语言。跟着这篇范文，学会如何构建有说服力的学术讨论回复。

Question

Your professor is teaching a class on society. Write a post responding to the professor’s question. In your response, you should do the following:

-Express and support your opinion.

-Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

Doctor Achebe

In 1930, a famous economist predicted that at the end of the twentieth century, an average worker would work only 15 hours a week, thanks to advances in technology. This did not happen, as we all know. Nonetheless, the balance between work time and free time remains an interesting question. So, let me ask you today: Twenty years in the future, will people have more leisure time (free time) and less work than they have today? Why, or why not?

Claire

I think it is likely that people will work shorter hours in twenty years than they do today. Our societies are becoming wealthier all the time. It does not seem necessary for people to continue working as hard as they do today. At some point, having more free time should be more important than creating more wealth.

Paul

I am not sure people will work less in the future. As Doctor Achebe wrote, a shortening of the workweek was predicted before. There are many factors that determine how long people work. Our economic system is very competitive. Workers are pushed to work longer and longer hours so that companies have a competitive advantage.

范文正文

I believe that people’s working time will be reduced in the next 20 years. As Claire mentioned, with increased wealth production, the workforce may not need to work as many hours and can have more time for leisure. Additionally, products and wealth in a society are meaningful only when they are consumed.【时间状语从句】 With more free time, consumption may increase as consumers have more opportunities to enjoy services and products from various industries, such as entertainment and hospitality. In this way, despite reduced working hours, the economy may continue to grow, which is why the authorities might consider shortening the workweek.【定语从句+表语从句】 Paul’s perspective is persuasive, as companies may extend employees’ workweek to produce more in a competitive society. However, advances in technology are making work more efficient. Gallup, a management consulting agency, found that nearly half (45%) of employees in the US say AI has helped improve their productivity. With ongoing progress in artificial intelligence, basic tasks can be completed by AI assistants such as OpenClaw. This makes it possible for employees to increase efficiency while reducing their working hours. Therefore, I maintain my view that in the future, people may work less.

写作思路和特色

这道题是2023年ETS提供的28套学术讨论样题中的第八套。题目中，教授问学生一个问题：20年后，人们是否会比现在休息的时间更多，工作的时间更少?Claire认为，20年后，人们的工作时间很可能会比现在更短。因为整个社会都在变得越来越富裕，就没有必要让人们像现在这样继续如此辛勤地工作。而Paul则认为，人们在未来也不一定会工作得更少。这是因为决定人们工作时长的因素有很多。为了公司能获取竞争优势，很多员工会被迫加班很长时间。这一点在未来也不太可能改变。

本文同意Claire的观点，认为在未来20年内，人们的劳动时间将会缩短。文章采取了“总论点+解释+让步反驳+总结”的结构。文章提出总论点后，先回应并延展Claire的观点：随着财富的增加，劳动力可能不再需要工作那么长时间，可以有更多时间用于休闲。此外，在一个社会中，产品和财富只有在被消费时才有意义。当人们有了更多空闲时间，就可能有更多机会享受来自各个行业(如娱乐和酒店业)的服务和产品，带来更多消费。这样一来，尽管劳动时间缩短，经济仍可能继续增长。这正是政府可能考虑缩短工作时长的原因。接下来，文章提及对方Paul的观点，认为其很有说服力，因为在竞争激烈的社会中，企业可能会延长员工的劳动时间以增加产出。然而，科技的进步使工作变得更加。文章引用了管理咨询公司盖洛普的调查结果。该调查发现，近一半(45%)的美国员工表示，人工智能帮助他们提高了工作效率。随着人工智能的持续发展，基础性的工作任务可以由AI助手(如OpenClaw)来完成。这使得员工在减少工作时间的同时，能够提高工作效率。因此，我认为未来人们的工作时间可能会缩短。

这道题所讨论的“未来是否会减少工作时间”的话题，在最近几年的托福、雅思、ESL的阅读和写作题目中都频繁出现，可能与近年来AI技术的发展、人们开始更多思考工作与生活的平衡有关。因此考前有必要提前准备好相关写作素材和思路，提场上的构思和写作效率。本文的结构比较清晰，用词偏基础。在内容上，为同学们提供了与人工智能提高工作效率相关的一项真实的调查结果，可以作为例子用在写作中。

用词用语整理

【时间状语从句】

Additionally, products and wealth in a society are meaningful only when they are consumed.

这句话的意思是“另外，只有当社会中的产品和财富得到了消费，它们才有意义”。句子在文中起到承上启下的作用。它承接了上一句Claire的观点：人们有钱了，不需要花太多时间在工作上。并给出了理由：这是因为人们创造的财富需要被消费。接着就可以将“消费”与“经济增长”相联系，实现“减工时→更多休闲→产品要消费才有意义(此句)→消费增加→经济不降反增→减工时可行”的逻辑链条。这句话比较简洁地补全了逻辑链。

【定语从句+表语从句】

In this way, despite reduced working hours, the economy may continue to grow, which is why authorities might consider shortening the workweek.

这道题目问的是“人们未来是否会减少工作时间?”写作时，需要给出一个推测出来的结果，并说明原因，而非讨论“减少工作时间的好处”。本句在最后用which引导的定语从句指出，由于有上述好处，所以政府可能会考虑减少工作时长。从原本的论述“好处”，回到了“因果”上，让文章的论述更切题、逻辑更严密。

workforce n. 劳动力

Much of the workforce in the banking sector is/are affected by the new legislation.银行部门的大部分员工都受到了新法律的影响。

hospitality n. 招待，款待，酒店业

Most of her friends work in hospitality so they tend to have unsociable hours.她的大多数朋友都在酒店业工作，因此他们的工作时间往往不规律。

the authorities n. 当局，有关部门

I’m going to report these potholes to the authorities.这条路的路面坑坑洼洼，我要把这一情况报告给有关部门。

这篇范文的精髓在于“回应对话+延展观点+数据支撑+逻辑闭环”——它不仅是一篇高分范例，更是一套可复用的写作方法论。文中用AI效率的调研数据强化论证，以“减工时→消费增加→经济增长→政府可能推动”的逻辑链条完成了从观点到论证的完整闭环。考托人们，好词好句已为你整理好，结合批注逐句拆解，下次遇到工作与生活平衡话题，直接套用这套结构，冲高分更有底气。