2023年新航道托福写作新题型范文集：Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

4月11日，ETS在北京召开了全球发布会，宣布了托福考试全新升级的消息，托福考试迎来全面改革!

自2023年7月26日起， 托福iBT考试的时长将由3小时缩短至2小时以内，取消考试中的10分钟休息时间。其中改革比较多就是托福写作，可以用2个关键字抓住改革的精髓：“短”和“学术”。

►关键字1：“短”：

改革之前要求在30分钟内完成至少300字的独立写作，而现在只要求100字，当然时间也缩短到10分钟。

表面上看，输出速度没有变化，都是10字/分钟。但是，构思慢的学生要小心了。之前完全可以用10分钟构思，再用20分钟写作。现在必须“短平快”：2分钟内读完教授的邮件和学生留言，然后形成自己的思路，马上动笔，绝 对不能拖泥带水。

►关键字2：“学术”：

旧版托福写作有一些接地气的题目，比如《你愿意在家吃饭，还是去饭店?》。问的是个人偏好(Personal Preference)。考生不需要有什么知识储备，只要有生活常识和基本英文能力就能交出一份答案。即便是低龄考生和脱离学校很久的社会人士也可以得到不错的分数。

改革后的题目会“高冷”很多。比如一道样题问你：在过去的两个世纪，推动人类社会进步的最重要的发明是什么?题目还规定你不许讲电脑和手机。ETS示范的满分答卷讨论了“疫苗和抗生素”。但是仔细想想，这要求考生(1)了解科技进步史;(2)有话题词汇储备，比如vaccine, antibiotic, lifespan, pathogen。显然，学术讨论不是仅靠常识就能hold住的。

为了更好的帮助大家考好理想的托福写作分数，今天小编整理了2023年新航道托福写作新题范文集，本篇文章的主题是Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.一起来学习一下吧。

12023年新航道托福写作话题：

Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

In your response you should:

• express and support your opinion

• make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it.

2托福写作新题范文示例1：

Dr Gupta

As discussed in class, some parents closely monitor their children's use of technology,including reading their text messages. While this may be done with the intention of protecting their children, it has raised concerns about whether it violates their children's right to privacy. This issue has sparked a debate among parents, educators, and experts about the extent to which parents should monitor their children's online activities. So, where do you stand on this issue?

Tom

I think parents should closely monitor their children's online activity. With all the dangers that exist online, it's important for parents to know what their children are doing and who they're talking to. Reading their text messages is a way to ensure their safety and prevent them from being exposed to harmful content or people.

Jerry

I disagree. While I understand the importance of protecting children, I believe that monitoring their every move online is a violation of their right to privacy. Children deserve to have some level of independence and trust from their parents. Instead of reading their text messages,parents should focus on building a strong relationship with their children and educating them

about how to stay safe online.

32023年新航道托福写作新题范文示例2：

I favor Tom's opinion that parents should have the right to monitor children's activities online for the protection of their children. I would like to add that monitoring children's activities tends to serve as a method to improve the relationship between parents and children since parents will surely know their children's inclinations by monitoring their behaviors, thus understanding their interests. Then, parents can communicate with their children about their hobbies, so naturally, children will grow more adoration towards their parents, thus improving the relationship between parents and children. Of course, I have to admit that the infringement of privacy may be legally inappropriate and emotionally hurtful. However, compared with the enhanced security and relationship, such damage is negligible. At the same time, with the development of technology, parents can monitor the children without being noticed, so the fear of exposure is unlikely to happen.

AI 打分及评语

Based on the rubric, I would rate the following sample answer with a score of 4 out of 5.

The response is relevant and effectively elaborates on the topic. The writer provides a clear opinion and supports it with reasoning and an additional point about building a strong

relationship with children. The writer also acknowledges the potential infringement of privacy and provides a solution to avoid it. The language is generally clear and well-expressed, with

a good use of vocabulary and sentence structures.

Errors:

1. The phrase "I favor Tom's opinion" could be rephrased to "I agree with Tom's opinion" to avoid repetition of the word "opinion."

2. In the sentence "Of course, I have to admit that the infringement of privacy may be legally inappropriate and emotionally hurtful," the word "infringement" should be pluralized to "infringements."

3. In the sentence "However, compared with the enhanced security and relationship, such damage is negligible," the phrase "enhanced security and relationship" could be rephrased to "improved security and relationship" for clarity.