每场雅思考试之后，第 一时间分享本场考试雅思A类大作文的范文权威解析。欢迎每周锁定。

12025年11月24日雅思大作文题目

Some people think it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

题目分析：这道题目属于典型双边讨论的议论文，双边讨论类题型，要求先客观分析“小组学习更有效”和“独自学习更优”两种观点，最终必须给出个人明确立场
• 支持小组学习（Group Study）的核心论点：
1. 思维碰撞：通过讨论澄清疑问，弥补个人知识盲区（如难题互助解析）；
2. 能力培养：提升沟通表达、团队协作与问题解决能力；
3. 学习动力：同伴监督减少惰性，增强学习积极性（如小组打卡、共同目标）；

• 支持独自学习（Study Alone）的核心论点：
1. 专注度更高：避免群体干扰，适合深度思考（如理科逻辑推导、文科记忆）；
2. 个性化节奏：可根据自身薄弱点调整学习进度，灵活安排任务；
3. 独立思考能力：培养自主分析问题、解决问题的能力，避免过度依赖他人；

22025年11月24日雅思大作文范文及解析

Introduction
The debate over whether group study or solo study yields greater benefits for students has long been a focal point in educational discourse. While both approaches have garnered staunch advocacy, their efficacy, personally, is inherently context-dependent, rather than universally applicable.
 解析

yield        v.产生（收益、效益等），产生（结果）；focal   adj.焦点的，在焦点上的；
discourse   n.演讲，论述；谈话，交流；
garner   vt.获得；
staunch    adj.坚定的；忠诚的；
efficacy     n.<正式>功效，效力
inherentlyadv.内在地，固有地

译文参考：
小组学习与独立学习哪种方式能为学生带来更大益处，这一争论长期以来都是教育领域探讨的焦点。尽管两种学习方式均获得坚定拥护，但在我看来，其效用本质上取决于具体情境，而非具有普遍适用性。

Body paragraph 1
Proponents of group study emphasize its unparalleled role in fostering collaborative learning. No single student possesses a comprehensive grasp of all subjects, and academic conundrums often arise from these gaps. Exactly, a prominent strength of group study lies in its ability to mitigate individual knowledge limitations. When studying in groups, students are exposed to a spectrum of distinct perspectives and can leverage each other’s strengths, thereby enhancing the efficiency and depth of task completion. For instance, when dissecting an intricate economic case, one student might specialize in quantitative data interpretation, while another excels at applying theoretical frameworks. By synthesizing these complementary abilities, the group can develop a far more holistic and insightful solution than any individual working in isolation.

解析
proponent    n.<正式>支持者，建议者；
unparalleled   adj.无与伦比的，无双的；
foster     v.促进，培养；
collaborative    adj.合作的，协作的；
conundrum    n.令人迷惑的难题；
mitigate       v.<正式>减轻，缓和；
a spectrum of  一系列的；广泛的；多种多样的；
leverage    v.充分利用（资源、观点等）；
dissect   v.解剖（人或动物的尸体）；剖析，详细评论（某事物）；
intricate    adj.错综复杂的；难理解的，难学会的；
synthesizev.综合，结合；
holistic    adj.整体的，全面的；

译文参考：
小组学习的支持者着重强调其在促进协作式学习中所发挥的不可替代的作用。没有任何一名学生能够全面掌握所有学科知识，而学术难题的产生往往源于这些认知缺口。事实上，小组学习的一大显著优势在于其能够弥补个体知识的局限性。在小组学习场景中，学生能够接触到多样化的独特视角，并借助彼此的优势，进而提升任务完成的效率与深度。例如，在剖析复杂的经济案例时，一名学生可能擅长定量数据解读，而另一名学生则在理论框架应用方面表现突出。通过整合这些互补性能力，小组所能形成的解决方案远比任何单独学习的个体更为全面、富有洞察力。

Body paragraph 2
Conversely, solo study is irreplaceable for tasks demanding personalized learning and deep focus. Given the inherent differences in students’ learning aptitudes, academic foundations, and preferred rhythms, studying alone allows learners to tailor their pace and approach to their unique needs, directly boosting academic outcomes. Many students, particularly those who thrive in serene environments, achieve optimal results when studying independently in settings like libraries. Excessive noise and interruptions in group settings, by contrast, can trigger distraction and anxiety, significantly eroding study efficiency. Furthermore, solo study serves as a critical catalyst for nurturing critical thinking and self-reliance: students must independently analyse and resolve problems, rather than relying on immediate peer assistance. This process not only hones problem-solving skills but also fosters a profound sense of accomplishment upon achieving learning goals, which in turn strengthens confidence in tackling future academic challenges.

解析
aptitude    n.天资，天赋；
tailor     v.定做；迎合，使适应；
boost     v.使增长，推动；
serene    adj.平静的，安详的；
optimal    adj.最 佳的，最适的；
trigger     v.引发，激发；起动，触发；
erode    v.侵蚀，腐蚀；
catalyst    n.（化学）催化剂；诱因，诱导者；
accomplishment    n.成就，成绩；

译文参考：
相反，对于需要个性化学习与高度专注的任务而言，独立学习具有不可替代的作用。鉴于学生在学习资质、学术基础及偏好节奏上存在本质差异，独立学习能让学习者根据自身独特需求调整学习进度与方法，直接提升学术成效。许多学生——尤其是那些在安静环境中能高效学习的群体——在图书馆等场景下独自学习时能取得最 佳效果。相比之下，小组学习中的过度噪音与频繁干扰可能引发注意力分散与焦虑情绪，显著削弱学习效率。此外，独立学习是培养批判性思维与自主能力的关键催化剂：学生必须独立分析并解决问题，而非依赖同伴的即时帮助。这一过程不仅能锤炼问题解决能力，还能在达成学习目标时孕育深刻的成就感，进而增强应对未来学术挑战的信心。

Conclusion
In conclusion, group study and solo study each possess distinct advantages that cater to different learning scenarios. Group work excels at facilitating collaboration and addressing knowledge gaps through diverse viewpoints, while solo study is superior for cultivating deep focus and promoting personalized skill development. Students should therefore strategically select the approach that aligns with their specific learning objectives, enabling them to maximize their academic potential and achieve well-rounded growth.

解析
cater to  迎合：满足（某人或某物）的需求或要求；
facilitate    v.促进，推动；
address    v.处理，设法解决；
strategically   adv.战略性地；战略上；
align with   与某人或组织达成一致；

译文参考：
综上所述，小组学习与独立学习各具鲜明优势，能够满足不同的学习场景需求。小组学习擅长通过多元视角促进协作交流、弥补知识缺口，而独立学习则在培养高度专注与推动个性化技能发展方面更胜一筹。因此，学生应策略性地选择与自身具体学习目标相契合的学习方式，从而充分发挥学术潜力，实现全面发展。