2023年托福写作新题型范文集：Your professor is teaching a class on business. Write a post responding to the professor’s question

4月11日，ETS在北京召开了全球发布会，宣布了托福考试全新升级的消息，托福考试迎来全面改革!

自2023年7月26日起， 托福iBT考试的时长将由3小时缩短至2小时以内，取消考试中的10分钟休息时间。其中改革比较多就是托福写作，可以用2个关键字抓住改革的精髓：“短”和“学术”。

►关键字1：“短”：

改革之前要求在30分钟内完成至少300字的独立写作，而现在只要求100字，当然时间也缩短到10分钟。

表面上看，输出速度没有变化，都是10字/分钟。但是，构思慢的学生要小心了。之前完全可以用10分钟构思，再用20分钟写作。现在必须“短平快”：2分钟内读完教授的邮件和学生留言，然后形成自己的思路，马上动笔，绝 对不能拖泥带水。

►关键字2：“学术”：

旧版托福写作有一些接地气的题目，比如《你愿意在家吃饭，还是去饭店?》。问的是个人偏好(Personal Preference)。考生不需要有什么知识储备，只要有生活常识和基本英文能力就能交出一份答案。即便是低龄考生和脱离学校很久的社会人士也可以得到不错的分数。

改革后的题目会“高冷”很多。比如一道样题问你：在过去的两个世纪，推动人类社会进步的最重要的发明是什么?题目还规定你不许讲电脑和手机。ETS示范的满分答卷讨论了“疫苗和抗生素”。但是仔细想想，这要求考生(1)了解科技进步史;(2)有话题词汇储备，比如vaccine, antibiotic, lifespan, pathogen。显然，学术讨论不是仅靠常识就能hold住的。

为了更好的帮助大家考好理想的托福写作分数，今天小编整理了2023年托福写作新题范文集，本篇文章的主题是Your professor is teaching a class on business. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.一起来学习一下吧。

12023年托福写作话题：

Your professor is teaching a class on business. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

In your response, you should：

• express and support your personal opinion

• make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it.

2托福写作新题范文示例1：

Professor

Today, we're going to discuss the ways in which companies can impact society. In your opinion, what is the best way for a company to have a positive impact on society?

Sarah

I believe that companies should focus on their own operations. While charitable giving can be beneficial, it is a temporary fix that doesn't address the root causes of serious social and environmental problems. By doing business in more responsible ways, companies can have a more meaningful and lasting impact on society. Not only that, but if they attract positive attention from consumers and increase their profits because of their actions they will inspire other companies to do the same. That's the only way we can really fix society.

John

I disagree with Sarah. While those are very good points, I think that companies should focus on charitable giving and philanthropy. Charitable giving can provide immediate relief to those in need and contribute to the overall well-being of society right away. It could take years or decades for business changes to have a positive impact on society, and most people just

can't wait that long. For instance, donating money to a school can help students learn more effectively almost immediately.

32023年新航道托福写作新题范文示例2：

In my opinion, Sarah is right when she says that making profits is one of the main responsibilities of companies, so they should not focus on donating money to people in need.

While I acknowledge that theoretically the revenue of businesses generally is stabler than individuals and their profits may be considerable to some extent, I still insist that it is impractical and low-efficient for solving social issues. If all companies gave part of their profits or even revenues to others, they would have little money to construct new factories and recruit highly educated talents, which would slow down the development of the company or even the industry. Their revenue in turn might decline as well. By contrast, if companies focus on making profits, they will be more willing to allocate money to recruit people with great academic backgrounds and build well-equipped facilities, thereby developing more advanced technologies. In this case, companies can contribute more taxes to the authorities,which is the most effective way for the government to social issues. (171 words).

AI 打分及评语

Based on the rubric, I would rate the following sample answer with a score of 4 out of 5.

While the response expresses a clear opinion, it does not make a meaningful contribution to the discussion as it diverges from the professor's prompt and Sarah and John's arguments.

The writer also does not provide any support or evidence to back up their opinion.

In terms of language use, the response contains several grammatical errors such as "the revenue of businesses generally is stabler" which should be "the revenue of businesses is generally more stable." Additionally, the use of "low-efficient" is not idiomatic and should be replaced with "inefficient." The writer also uses awkward phrasing such as "they would have little money to construct new factories and recruit highly educated talents" which could be revised to "they would have limited funds to invest in building new facilities and hiring skilled employees."