2023年新航道托福写作新题型范文集：Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

4月11日，ETS在北京召开了全球发布会，宣布了托福考试全新升级的消息，托福考试迎来全面改革!

自2023年7月26日起， 托福iBT考试的时长将由3小时缩短至2小时以内，取消考试中的10分钟休息时间。其中改革比较多就是托福写作，可以用2个关键字抓住改革的精髓：“短”和“学术”。

►关键字1：“短”：

改革之前要求在30分钟内完成至少300字的独立写作，而现在只要求100字，当然时间也缩短到10分钟。

表面上看，输出速度没有变化，都是10字/分钟。但是，构思慢的学生要小心了。之前完全可以用10分钟构思，再用20分钟写作。现在必须“短平快”：2分钟内读完教授的邮件和学生留言，然后形成自己的思路，马上动笔，绝 对不能拖泥带水。

►关键字2：“学术”：

旧版托福写作有一些接地气的题目，比如《你愿意在家吃饭，还是去饭店?》。问的是个人偏好(Personal Preference)。考生不需要有什么知识储备，只要有生活常识和基本英文能力就能交出一份答案。即便是低龄考生和脱离学校很久的社会人士也可以得到不错的分数。

改革后的题目会“高冷”很多。比如一道样题问你：在过去的两个世纪，推动人类社会进步的最重要的发明是什么?题目还规定你不许讲电脑和手机。ETS示范的满分答卷讨论了“疫苗和抗生素”。但是仔细想想，这要求考生(1)了解科技进步史;(2)有话题词汇储备，比如vaccine, antibiotic, lifespan, pathogen。显然，学术讨论不是仅靠常识就能hold住的。

为了更好的帮助大家考好理想的托福写作分数，今天小编整理了2023年新航道托福写作新题范文集，本篇文章的主题是Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.一起来学习一下吧。

12023年新航道托福写作话题：

Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s

question.

In your response you should:

• express and support your opinion

• make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it.

2托福写作新题范文示例1：

Dr. Gupta

As we discussed in class, some charitable organizations provide the opportunity for donors to specify how their contributions are utilized, such as whether their funds are allocated towards direct aid or advertising expenses. In the event that you were to donate to a charity, do you prefer to have a say in the distribution of your donation, or do you believe it is more efficient to delegate that responsibility to the organization? Please provide justification for your position.

Tom

I believe donors should have a voice in determining how their charitable donations are utilized. Allowing donors to select where their funds go ensures accountability from the charitable organization. Without transparency in the allocation of funds, donors may lose trust in the charitable organization, leading to a decrease in future donations.

Jerry

I understand your point, but I think it is more effective to leave the decision-making to the charitable organization. They have the expertise and resources to determine where the funds will have the greatest impact. Donors may not have a complete understanding of the complexities and needs of the charity and may not make the best decision on how to allocate their funds.

32023年新航道托福写作新题范文示例2：

In a world where millions of people, especially those in poverty-stricken areas, still suffer from miseries and pain, indispensable are charitable organizations that intend to make a difference. When it comes to factors contributing to the success of charitable organizations,donors are the most essential one. I strongly support donors deciding how the organizations should allocate their funds. When analyzing areas and people in dire need of financial aid and telling whether the funds should be used in offering real help to those in need or in developing the organization, donors actually serve as a surveillance agency to hold charities accountable. Under such surveillance, there will be few instances of corruption and misuse of the donation. While donors may be less professional in distributing funds for now, they can learn to form a picture of how to make the best use of the donation.

AI 打分及评语

Based on the rubric, I would rate the following sample answer with a score of 4 out of 5.

The response is relevant, well-elaborated, and makes a valuable contribution to the online discussion. The writer effectively expresses their opinion and supports it with strong reasoning. The response also demonstrates consistent facility in the use of language, with effective use of a variety of syntactic structures and precise, idiomatic word choice, and only minor errors.

The sample answer contains minor punctuation errors, such as missing commas and incorrect capitalization, that do not significantly impact the clarity or coherence of the response. For example, the phrase "I strongly support donors deciding how the organizations should allocate their funds" could be improved with a comma after "support" to make it clearer. Additionally, there are some minor formatting errors, such as missing spaces after some periods, which do not significantly impact the quality of the writing. Overall, the errors are minor and do not detract from the effectiveness of the response.