首页>托福>写作>【GRE写作】The Issue Task 精选20讲 · 第8讲

【GRE写作】The Issue Task 精选20讲 · 第8讲

2021-09-01 11:35来源:互联网作者:上海管理员

摘要:不定期推送GRE写作中的【The Issue Task】精讲,帮助大家更好地备考GRE写作,欢迎锁定!

上一讲(Analyze an Issue Task的第7讲),我们学习了GRE写作中Analyze an Issue Task中颇具难度的一种指令:

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

简而言之,这种task direction对笔者的要求就是需要“有批判性地站边”,但站边的同时切莫忘记讨论“双边”,那就姑且称之为“双边观点类”问题指令吧。


Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.


但Issue Task不同于独立写作的是:Issue Task的论述方式仅限于logos and ethos,而托福的独立写作却是可以接纳pathos的,也就是大多数中国考生考T时动不动提笔就来“我有一个叔叔…”,这就为考试难度大大降维。





I agree with the issue that it is sometimes necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. A conflicting view would reveal a naivety about the inherent nature of public politics and about the sorts of compromises on the part of well-intentioned political leaders necessary in order to further the public’s ultimate interests. Nevertheless, we must not endow our political leaders with unrestricted freedom to withhold information; otherwise, we risk sanctioning demagoguery and undermining the philosophical underpinnings of any democratic society.


首段就建议大家写个1-2句话即可,直接开门见山亮观点——笔者同意some people的表述,且是有条件的同意。这个“有条件的”便能体现后文的批判性思维。

[Body Para. 1]

Behind my everlasting favor with some people is the reason that in order to gain the opportunity for effective public leadership, a would-be leader must first gain and maintain political power. In the realm of politics, complete forthrightness is a harbinger of vulnerability and naivety, neither of which earns a politician respect among his or her opponents, and which those opponents will use to every advantage to defeat the politician. In my observation, some measure of pandering to the electorate is necessary to gain and maintain political leadership. For example, were all politicians to fully disclose every personal defect, character flaw, and detail concerning personal life, few honest politicians would ever by elected. While this view might seem cynical, personal scandals have in fact proven the undoing of many a political career; thus, I think this view is realistic.

[Body Para. 2]

Another reason why I essentially air my endorsement is that political leaders’ being completely honest with social individuals would moderately threaten public safety and perhaps even national security. This is particularly authentic especially when it comes to certain types of shocking information. For example, if the President were to disclose the government’s strategies for thwarting specific plans of an international terrorist or a drug trafficker, those strategies would surely fail, and the public’s health and safety would be compromised as a result. Withholding information might also be necessary to avoid public panic and national hysteria. Acting as an analogy to ‘Star War’ series, The Martian Invasion broadcast in the USA might serve as a compelling illustration. While such cases are rare, they do occur occasionally. For another example, during the first few hours of the new millennium, the U.S. Pentagon’s missile defense system experienced a malfunction. This fact was withheld from the public until later that day, once the problem had been solved; and legitimately so, since immediate disclosure would have served no useful purpose and might even have resulted in mass hysteria.



[Body Para. 3]

Having recognized that withholding information from the public is often necessary to serve the interests of that public, legitimate political leadership nevertheless requires forthrightness with the citizenry as to the leader’s motives and agenda. History informs us that would-be leaders who lack such forthrightness are the same ones who seize and maintain power either by brute force or by demagoguery – that is, by deceiving and manipulating the citizenry. Paragons such as Genghis Khan, respectively, come immediately to my mind. Any democratic society should of course abhor demagoguery, which operates against the democratic principle of government by the people. Consider also less egregious examples, such as President Nixon’s withholding of information about his active role in the Watergate cover-up. His behavior demonstrated a concern for self-interest above the broader interests of the democratic system that granted his political authority in the first place.


本段涉及的人物和事件,可以进入大家的exemplification pool. 你可以不精通、不熟知,但你不能没听过吧?


In sum, the game of politics calls for a certain amount of disingenuousness and lack of forthrightness that we might otherwise characterize as dishonesty. And such behavior is a necessary means to the final objective of effective political leadership. Nevertheless, in any democracy a leader who relies chiefly on deception and secrecy to preserve that leadership, to advance a private agenda, or to conceal selfish motives, betrays the democracy-and ends up forfeiting the political game.


Conclusion其实就是restatement of the author’s ideas. 索性就再把conditional agreement交代一遍就好了。







  • 走读班(6-10人)
  • 走读班(20-30人)
  • 住宿班(6-10人)
  • 住宿班(20-30人)
  • 托福一对一
课程名称 班级人数 课时 学费 报名
托福基础走读班(6-10人) 6-10人 144课时 ¥29800 在线咨询
托福全程走读班(6-10人) 6-10人 192课时 ¥39800 在线咨询
托福强化走读班(6-10人) 6-10人 96课时 ¥24800 在线咨询
托福十一特训班 6-10人 56 ¥15800 在线咨询
托福特训班(4周,走读) 8-10人 192 ¥34800 在线咨询
课程名称 班级人数 课时 学费 报名
托福全程班(20-30人,走读) 20-30人 192课时 ¥13800 在线咨询
托福强化班(20-30人,走读) 20-30人 96课时 ¥7800 在线咨询
托福冲刺班(20-30人,走读) 20-30人 96课时 ¥8800 在线咨询
课程名称 班级人数 课时 学费 报名
托福基础班(6-10人,住宿) 6-10人 144课时 ¥28800 在线咨询
托福全程班(4周,住宿) 6-10人 304课时 ¥41800 在线咨询
托福长线班(6-10人,住宿) 6-10人 380课时 ¥46800 在线咨询
托福词汇语法住宿班(6-10人) 6-10人 48课时 ¥8800 在线咨询
托福精听精读住宿班(6-10人) 6-10人 48课时 ¥8800 在线咨询
课程名称 班级人数 课时 学费 报名
托福全程班(20-30人,住宿) 20-30人 192课时 ¥15800 在线咨询
托福强化班(20-30人,住宿) 20-30人 96课时 ¥8800 在线咨询
托福冲刺班(20-30人,住宿) 20-30人 96课时 ¥9800 在线咨询
课程名称 班级人数 课时 学费 报名
托福一对一 1 按需定制 ¥980元 在线咨询
托福精听精读十一特训班 在线咨询
托福免费试听课 ¥0元 在线咨询


  • 徐家汇校区
  • 人民广场校区
  • 浦东校区
  • 中山公园校区
  • 杨浦校区
  • 闵行校区
  • 松江校区
  • 封闭集训营
  • 地址:徐汇区裕德路126号


  • 地址:南京西路338号天安中心24楼


  • 地址:浦东新区世纪大道1128号耀通科技大厦3楼(地铁2号线世纪大道站12号口出)


  • 地址:长宁路1158号 贝多芬广场 A座4楼414室


  • 地址:杨浦区国宾路18号万达广场A座18楼


  • 地址:东川路1779-19号

    乘车路线:地铁5号线 东川路站4号口出

  • 地址:松江大学城四期校区:文汇路928弄想飞天地2204


  • 地址:上海市浦东新区惠南镇拱极路2151号


总部地址:北京市海淀区中关村大街28-1号6层601 总部电话:400-779-6688 总部:北京新航道教育文化发展有限责任公司

Copyright © www.xhd.cn All Rights Reserved 京ICP备05069206

  • 微信公众号
  • 微信社群