高能成就高分，但高分并不一定高能。如何能让学生既能高分也能高能呢？纵观那么多考SAT的学生，为什么大部分都考不到理想分数，而被成绩刷下来呢？除了不断的训练SAT写作真题和范文以外，到底应该怎么做才能提高学生的成绩呢？以下的SAT写作范文来自新航道SAT培训教研组，针对目前还苦于无从下手的考生们希望这些SAT写作范文能够给到你们帮助。

  SAT写作真题：

  SAT写作题目:

  Write an essay in which you explain how Martin Luther King Jr. builds an　argument to persuade his audience that American involvement in the　Vietnam War is unjust. In your essay, analyze how King uses one or more of the　features listed in the box above (or features of your own choice) to strengthen　the logic and persuasiveness of his argument. Be sure that your analysis　focuses on the most relevant features of the passage.　Your essay should not explain whether you agree with King’s claims, but　rather explain how King builds an argument to persuade his audience.

  SAT写作满分范文：

　　In his speech titled “Beyond VietnamOOA Time to Break Silence”, the famous social　activist Martin Luther King Jr. uttered his condemnation of America’s involvement　in the Vietnam War. Such an argument is made convincing mainly by Martin’s　personal anecdote and is reinforced by the use of such rhetorical devices as　contrast and rhetorical repetition.

　　To make a tenable argument, King needs to approach the topic discreetly with a　wellOjustified reason. And he has made this clear at the very beginning of the　speech, claiming it is to do with his role as a preacher who naturally cares about　people’s morality. After a confession of the disillusion of his earlier dreams　concerning the poverty programs, where “there were experiments, hopes, new　beginning”, King has become increasingly sober and watches the program “broken　and eviscerated”; he realizes that the country would rather invest in Vietnam Wars　rather than the rehabilitation of the poor in its own country. Therefore, he is forced　to “see the war as an enemy of the poor and attack it” vehemently.

  　His conviction is hardened with a second realization: the “War was doing far more　than devastating the hopes of the poor at home”, rather, it manipulated everyone　involved, especially those poor black men who had been sent to the War. They did　not enjoy equal rights as the whites back in their own country but were fighting for　liberties of another nation; they were poor people themselves, but they were　burning down huts of impoverished locals on foreign soil. They were fighting and　dying for their nation which could not treat them fairly and equally. Such brutal　irony was highlighted.

　　Again, to make his argument more credible, King adds another anecdote: his　personal encounter with people from the ghettos in the North. As he preaches on　nonviolent action to secure meaningful social change to “the desperate, rejected,　and angry young men”, he is interrogated and realizes that his own country is　doing the opposite to get what it wants, “using massive doses of violence to solve　its problems”.

　　To conclude the speech, Martin further reiterates his clinging to pacifism and　maintains that the war in Vietnam can never save the nation but will deprive of　people of their deepest hopes.

　　In this way, the logic behind the argument is clear enough. Rather than giving　people hopes and equality, the war worsens the situation and drags the whole　nation into the abyss of pain (Or “ like some demonic destructive suction tube “ as　King puts it) and is thus a waste of energies and resources, which could have been　invested on improving the welfare and benefits of its own poor citizens. The war　also costs innocent lives who are dying for the nation and deserve more than they　did get. And finally, the war solves no practical problems for the US and merely　poisons the spirit of all people.

　　In terms of stylistic and persuasive elements, Martin’s employment of contrast and　rhetorical repetition is worth mentioning. He draws a contrast between those　tricked soldiers who were sent to war by saying that “We were taking the black　young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand　miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in　southwest Georgia and East Harlem.” In this way, strange and faraway Vietnam is　made tangible, and the situation clear where the irony lies. Also, he asserts that,　“we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white　boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable　to seat them together in the same schools. And so we watch them in brutal　solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, but we realize that they would hardly　live on the same block in Chicago. “ Bubbles of the dreams fall apart and the harsh　reality reveals itself. What concerns the young men remains largely unchanged　while they are dying for little value.

　　The use of rhetorical repetition is most evident in the sentence “For the sake of　those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of　thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent.” which has given much　weight to the justice of his speaking out what has to be said, namely, the war has to　be stopped; and the US definitely has no role to play in it.

2016SAT真题下载：2016年10月1日亚太SAT真题PDF下载、2016年10月1日北美SAT真题及答案下载、2016年5月亚太SAT真题及答案下载、2016年5月北美SAT真题及答案下载