2023年托福写作新题型范文集：Your professor is teaching a class on political science. Write a post responding to the professor's question

4月11日，ETS在北京召开了全球发布会，宣布了托福考试全新升级的消息，托福考试迎来全面改革!

自2023年7月26日起， 托福iBT考试的时长将由3小时缩短至2小时以内，取消考试中的10分钟休息时间。其中改革比较多就是托福写作，可以用2个关键字抓住改革的精髓：“短”和“学术”。

►关键字1：“短”：

改革之前要求在30分钟内完成至少300字的独立写作，而现在只要求100字，当然时间也缩短到10分钟。

表面上看，输出速度没有变化，都是10字/分钟。但是，构思慢的学生要小心了。之前完全可以用10分钟构思，再用20分钟写作。现在必须“短平快”：2分钟内读完教授的邮件和学生留言，然后形成自己的思路，马上动笔，绝 对不能拖泥带水。

►关键字2：“学术”：

旧版托福写作有一些接地气的题目，比如《你愿意在家吃饭，还是去饭店?》。问的是个人偏好(Personal Preference)。考生不需要有什么知识储备，只要有生活常识和基本英文能力就能交出一份答案。即便是低龄考生和脱离学校很久的社会人士也可以得到不错的分数。

改革后的题目会“高冷”很多。比如一道样题问你：在过去的两个世纪，推动人类社会进步的最重要的发明是什么?题目还规定你不许讲电脑和手机。ETS示范的满分答卷讨论了“疫苗和抗生素”。但是仔细想想，这要求考生(1)了解科技进步史;(2)有话题词汇储备，比如vaccine, antibiotic, lifespan, pathogen。显然，学术讨论不是仅靠常识就能hold住的。

为了更好的帮助大家考好理想的托福写作分数，今天小编整理了2023年托福写作新题范文集，本篇文章的主题是Your professor is teaching a class on political science. Write a post responding to the professor's question一起来学习一下吧。

12023年托福写作话题：

Your professor is teaching a class on political science. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response, you should:

• express and support your personal opinion

• make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it.

2托福写作新题范文示例1：

Professor

Today we're going to discuss whether the government should tax unhealthy products, such as sugary drinks and junk food. On one hand, taxing these products could discourage

people from consuming them and reduce health problems. On the other hand, some argue that such taxes unfairly target lower-income families who may rely on these products as

affordable sources of food. If you had to choose, would you support or oppose taxing unhealthy products? Why?

Sam

I support the idea of taxing unhealthy products. These products are often high in sugar, salt, and fat, which can lead to serious health problems such as obesity, diabetes, and heart

disease. As you said, by taxing these products, the government can discourage people from consuming them and resolve some of these health issues. Moreover, the revenue generated

from such taxes can be used to fund advertising campaigns that promote healthy eating habits.

Tanya

I disagree. I believe that such taxes are unfair to families that don't have a lot of money.

Wealthy people will not care about the taxes and their habits won't change. Additionally, if these taxes are implemented people might try to save money by purchasing lower-quality

products that are cheaper in the first place. That means they could suffer even more health problems.

32023年新航道托福写作新题范文示例2：

To my mind, the view of Sam has considerable long-term merits since the supply and demand of unhealthy products both will decline. Assuming that the average price of

unhealthy food, such as candies and fried chicken, increases to be higher owing to the heavy tax, most common people will naturally reduce the consumption because they have to

take their daily cost into consideration, let alone those living in poverty. With less needs in the market, fewer factories would be willing to produce too much. Furthermore, the

expensive snacks and fast food urge people to be aware of the impacts from the intake of unhealthy food. Apart from this, the tax obtained by authorities could be re-invested in

supporting public advertisement and manufacturers of healthy food so as to publicize the virtues of healthy eating habits. In a long run, the majority of people will not choose the

unhealthy ones as stated by Tanya. Therefore, levying tax on unhealthy products is reasonable.

AI 打分及评语

Based on the rubric, I would rate the following sample answer with a score of 4 out of 5.

Grammatical errors:

"considerable long-term merits" should be "considerable long-term merit"

1. "the consumption because they have" should be "consumption because they have"

2. "fewer factories would be willing to produce too much" should be "fewer factories would be willing to produce as much"

3. "the tax obtained by authorities could be re-invested" should be "the tax revenue obtained by authorities could be reinvested".