2023年新航道托福写作新题型范文集：Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question

4月11日，ETS在北京召开了全球发布会，宣布了托福考试全新升级的消息，托福考试迎来全面改革!

自2023年7月26日起， 托福iBT考试的时长将由3小时缩短至2小时以内，取消考试中的10分钟休息时间。其中改革比较多就是托福写作，可以用2个关键字抓住改革的精髓：“短”和“学术”。

►关键字1：“短”：

改革之前要求在30分钟内完成至少300字的独立写作，而现在只要求100字，当然时间也缩短到10分钟。

表面上看，输出速度没有变化，都是10字/分钟。但是，构思慢的学生要小心了。之前完全可以用10分钟构思，再用20分钟写作。现在必须“短平快”：2分钟内读完教授的邮件和学生留言，然后形成自己的思路，马上动笔，绝 对不能拖泥带水。

►关键字2：“学术”：

旧版托福写作有一些接地气的题目，比如《你愿意在家吃饭，还是去饭店?》。问的是个人偏好(Personal Preference)。考生不需要有什么知识储备，只要有生活常识和基本英文能力就能交出一份答案。即便是低龄考生和脱离学校很久的社会人士也可以得到不错的分数。

改革后的题目会“高冷”很多。比如一道样题问你：在过去的两个世纪，推动人类社会进步的最重要的发明是什么?题目还规定你不许讲电脑和手机。ETS示范的满分答卷讨论了“疫苗和抗生素”。但是仔细想想，这要求考生(1)了解科技进步史;(2)有话题词汇储备，比如vaccine, antibiotic, lifespan, pathogen。显然，学术讨论不是仅靠常识就能hold住的。

为了更好的帮助大家考好理想的托福写作分数，今天小编整理了2023年新航道托福写作新题范文集，本篇文章的主题是Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.一起来学习一下吧。

12023年新航道托福写作话题：

Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

In your response you should:

• express and support your opinion

• make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You will have 10 minutes to write it.

2托福写作新题范文示例1：

Dr Gupta

As I discussed in class, universities in the United States have doubled their tuition fees over the past two decades. This has led to students taking out more loans to pay for their education. Some argue that universities should not be allowed to increase tuition fees so much, as it places a financial burden on students. In your opinion, should there be limits on how much universities can increase tuition fees, or should they be able to raise tuition as much as they wish? Why do you believe this?

Tom

I believe universities should have limits on tuition increases. When tuition increases so much, it puts a burden on students who have to take out loans to afford university education. This leads to a lot of student debt that takes years to pay off. If tuition increases were more limited,it would be easier for students to afford education and graduate without a lot of debt.

Jerry

I disagree. Universities should be able to increase tuition as much as they wish. Higher tuition allows universities to have more money to invest in research, faculty, and facilities.

This will ultimately lead to a better education for students. Students who can't afford higher tuition can apply for scholarships or financial aid. It's not fair to limit tuition increases just to make it easier for students to afford education.

32023年新航道托福写作新题范文示例2：

Personally, I would be in favor of Tom's opinion that it is by no means necessary or imperative for the university to raise the tuition fees. In other words, the university tuition fees should be confined to a certain level, by which the students could not only afford their schooling cost but also focus more on their study. In particular some financially disadvantaged students, e.g. the unemployed, the impoverished and the rural, once being plagued by a huge financial burden from higher fees, would be compelled to undertake some part-time jobs in their spare time, which will pose a major negative influence to their academic achievement. As a result, they would be strongly unlikely to graduate smoothly and successfully. Thus only if the tuition fees are restricted to a fair and reasonable level, will the educational quality in university be guaranteed in a long run.

AI 打分及评语

Based on the rubric, I would rate the following sample answer with a score of 4 out of 5.

Errors: The response has some minor grammatical errors and awkward phrasing such as "confined to a certain level" instead of "limited to a certain level." The argument could also benefit from more specific examples to support the main point.

The response is relevant and well-elaborated, expressing a clear stance on the issue and supporting it with reasoning. The writer effectively uses a variety of syntactic structures and precise word choice to convey their ideas. However, there are a few minor errors in grammar and word choice that suggest the writer may not be a native speaker of English. For example, the phrase "it is by no means necessary or imperative" could be more simply and idiomatically expressed as "it is not necessary." Additionally, the use of "plagued by a huge financial burden" may not be the most natural way to express the idea of facing a large financial burden. Overall, though, the response demonstrates consistent facility in the use of language and effectively contributes to the discussion