剑10test3雅思写作task2范文:博物馆是否需要收取门票(支持)
剑10test3雅思写作task2考题:博物馆是否需要收取门票Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advances of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
新航道雅思培训团队分别是两种对立的观点写了两篇范文,本篇分享的是支持收取门票的观点。
参考范文2——支持博物馆收取门票
In this essay. I will argue that museums should charge admission fees and the idea of free universities should be wrapped.
When it come to museum,it is evident that the current model has many problems. In this current era, some museum rely on government handouts to remain open, thus taking away money that could be better spent on providing tax cuts for businesses or subsidies for failing banks. In return, all the museum offers is a collection of things from the past that people stopped using because they were no longer useful, such as art or other aspects of a forgotten culture.
In my opinion, a museum should only exist if people are willing to spend money visiting it. For example, a museum dedicated to apple, showing the various phones and pads the company has developed, would be fascinating and well worth an entry fee. Also, the museum could sell current products for a profit. This would provide people with places to go, but also generate money by itself, thus relieving the burdens placed upon a government.
Free museums ire bad because anyone can visit them, including the homeless and unemployed. These people should be looking for a job, but instead they congregate in museums and thus waste their time and society's resources. Some people would argue that museums provide a valuable service to society, and so should be free for every level of society, but I would say that this is wrong - all a museum does is show us how people lived in the past. If that was useful, why are we not still living like that? Museums cannot teach us how to get a better job or make more money, so they’re really not so useful and should be expected to exist on their own merits.
(304 words)
在这篇文章中,我将论证博物馆应该收取门票的观点,而免门票的观点应该被摒弃。
说到博场馆,很显然现行的运营模式存在很多问题。在当今这个时代,一些博物馆依靠政府的救济维持经营,而这些拨款原本可以更好地用于降低商业税费或补贴破产银行,而作为回报,博物馆只是展示了一些人们不会再使用的历史遗物,因为它们已经毫无用途,如艺术品或其他放遗忘的文化要素。
我认为,只有人们愿意花钱去参观时,一个博物馆才应该存在。例如,一家苹果品牌博物馆,其中展示了苹果公司研究的多款手机和平板电脑,这是非常有趣且值得花钱参现的。同时,这个博物馆还可以出售流行的产品以获取利润,这不仅能为人们提供去处,还能产生经济效,从而减轻政府的资担。
免费博物馆存在缺陷,因为任何人可以参现,包括流浪者和失业人员,这些人应该去找工作,而不是聚集在博物馆里浪费自己的时间和社会资源,有些人会说,博物馆为社会提供了有价值的服务,应该对社会各阶层免费,但我想说这一观点并不正确——博物馆所做的只是向我们展示古人的生活方式。如果它是有用的,那我们为什么不继续那样生活?博物馆不能教会我们如何找到更好的工作或者挣更多的钱,因此它们并没有太大用途,应该任其“自费自理”。
新航道雅思辅导班 ,多种班型任你选!