剑10test3雅思写作task2范文：博物馆是否需要收取门票(反对)

　　剑10test3雅思写作task2范文：博物馆是否需要收取门票(反对)

　　Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advances of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

　　a)题目分析，包括写作中需要讨论的观点以及考生可能对题目产生的错误理解。

　　考生需要就支持和反对博物馆收取门票这两个方面进行论证。常见的错误是只论其——两方面内容必须均有所呈现且有所关联。

　　b)两篇观点不同的参考范文

　　参考范文1——支持博物馆免门票

　　In this essay, I will examine the arguments for and against charging admission to

　　museums with particular attention paid to the benefits of free education.

　　In London there are many museums. Some, like the National Malory Museum or the British Museum are subsidized by the government and are therefore free of charge. Other, lake the John Soane’s Museum, are private affairs, charging a nominal fee which goes to maintenance and upkeep. Personally, I cannot think of example of a “for profit “museum, run like a business, although I would be surprised if they didn’t exist somewhere in the world.

　　Charging admission fees makes a certain kind of sense. Museum are usually large spaces, and must by necessity be well lit and ventilated, staffed with curators and experts, of course. By charging ( often priceless) kept under good security measures. None of these is free, of course. By charging admission, the museum can hope to earn back some money and not rely on the goodwill of governments and patrons alone to support it. While this makes economic sense, a museum is not an economic enterprise, so it follows that is line of argument is essentially redundant.

　　A museum is a repository of information and artifacts, meant to provide with a sense of continuity to the past. In essence, a museum is for all of us - a window into our collective past from which we may see the present from a slightly different, more informed, angle. An such, denying a segment of society the chance to visit may not have catastrophic effects, but by limiting the worldview of some, all people will suffer the effects of their ignorance, thus limiting humanity by steady increments.

　　Instead of viewing museums as something similar to a theme park or a cinema, it may perhaps be more helpful to think of them as roads - publicly owned and maintained arteries of civilisation.(323 words)

　　在这篇文章中，我将详细讨论支持和反对博物馆收取门票的观点，并将重点放在免门票的意义上。

　　伦敦有许多博物馆。有一些，如国家历史博物馆或大英博物馆，是由政府给予财政补贴，因此是免费开放的;还有一些，如约翰·索恩爵士博物馆，则由个人经营，收取极少的费用用于维护与管理。就我个人而言，我无法想到一个像企业一样“为了盈利”二开放的博物馆，但假如世界上不存在这样的博物馆，我又会感到惊讶。

　　收取门票具有一定的合理性，因为博物馆通常占地面权较大，且照明和通风效果必须良好，还需配备管理和专业人员，另外展览品(通常是无价之宝)也需要严密的安保措施。当日然，这其中的每一项都不是免费的。通过收取门票，博物馆就能收回一些成本，但博物馆并不是经济型企业，因此这一论证是无意义的。

　　博物馆就像一座充满信息和艺术品的宝库，其目的在于带给参观者一种历史的延续感。从本质上说，博物馆是为每一个人开放的，是了解我们共同历史的一个窗口。在这里，我们能从略有不同、更加清晰的角度审视现在。这样说来，剥夺一部分人的参观机会也许不会造成毁灭性的后果，但当一些人的世界观被局限，整个民族都将因为这些人的无知受到牵连，以至于逐渐限制人类的发展。

　　与其将博物馆看作和主题公园或电影院一样，也许将它视为“道路”会更加有益——为大众所共有并维持着文明的动脉。

　　新航道雅思辅导班 ，多种班型任你选!